The earth’s forests have been broken into around 50 million fragments, the edges of which add up to a length that would make it a third of the way to the sun and which increase annual tropical deforestation carbon emissions by 31 per cent.
This, according to a new study published recently in Nature Communications that reveals forest fragmentation may be much more destructive than previously thought.
A few hundred years ago, most large tropical forests stood vast and largely undisturbed. But since then, agriculture and extractive industries have moved in, whittling away forests to make room for cattle pasture and soy fields, palm oil plantations and acacia concessions.
Today, owing primarily to human pressures, many of the world’s tropical forests exist as a collection of remnants.
The Atlantic Forest is one of these. Once covering a huge swath of the eastern coast of Brazil and into Paraguay, Uruguay, and Argentina, the Atlantic Forest (called Mata Atlântica in Portuguese) has largely disappeared, and some researchers estimate just 3.5 percent may still remain – mostly as fragments interspersed in an expanse of pasture and cropland.
Research has shown that forest fragmentation can have dire effects on wildlife, leading to higher extinction rates than if a forest is simply reduced in size while remaining in one piece.
“
Large trees suffer most from this development, because they are reliant on a good supply of water.
Andreas Huth, researcher and study coauthor, Hemholtz Center
But how fragmentation affects carbon emissions is something that scientists haven’t been able to grasp – until now.
Enter researchers with the Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research and the University of Maryland.
They drew on previous studies that showed tree mortality in tropical forests was affected significantly by where they trees were, with trees on the edges of forests having double the chances of dying in a given year.
This is because vegetation at edges is exposed to harsher conditions like stronger wind, more intense solar radiation, and lower humidity than trees in the interior of forests.
The research showed that this wasn’t only affecting periphery trees, but also tree as far as a hundred meters into forests.
“Large trees suffer most from this development, because they are reliant on a good supply of water,” said Andreas Huth of the Hemholtz Center, coauthor of the study released this week.
But how much is this fragmentation edge effect contributing to carbon emissions and, thus, global warming? To find out, Huth and his colleagues developed their own software to analyse satellite data and determine just how many forest edges human disturbance has created.
Turns out, it’s a lot – around 50 million kilometers of edges for as many fragments. Placed end-to-end, these forest edges would make it about a third of the way from the earth to the sun.
According to the study’s findings, 19 per cent of the world’s tropical forests are currently 100 meters (328 feet) or less from a forest edge.
Current estimates peg the volume of carbon emissions from the clearing of tropical forests at around 1,100 million metric tons annually.
Using field data and computer modeling, the team calculated 340 million more metric tons of carbon may be released globally due to forest edge effects. In other words, the study finds forest fragmentation may be contributing 31 per cent more carbon to the atmosphere than previous estimates are accounting for.
The study highlighted three regions the researchers found had particularly high carbon emissions from forest fragmentation: El Salvador/Guatemala, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Sumatra in Indonesia. Image from Brinck et al., 2017
Tree cover data from the University of Maryland show dense forest straddling the border between El Salvador and Guatemala exists largely as fragments, with tree cover loss around their edges.
The east-central portion of the Democratic Republic of Congo is severely deforested, with its primary forest existing as fragments and strips. Satellite data indicate tree cover loss is ongoing in the region.
“Fragmentation therefore plays an important role in the global carbon cycle,” Huth said. “Despite this fact, this effect has not been taken into consideration at all in the IPCC reports to date.”
The IPCC to which Huth is referring is the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the international body responsible for assessing science related to climate change.
The IPCC’s findings provide the scientific scaffolds that inform policymakers and underlie the negotiations at the UN Climate Conference – the United Nations Framework on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
One component of the UNFCCC is REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation), a program that aims to keep tropical forests in the ground – and, thus, carbon out of the atmosphere – by providing financial incentives to the developing countries that contain them.
The researchers hope the influence of forest fragmentation on carbon emissions will be taken into account when it comes to climate change policies and programs.
“Our analyses show that forest fragmentation augments carbon emissions beyond those caused by deforestation,” they write in their study. “Although we expect that our study bases on conservative assumptions, they are already substantial enough to highlight the importance of forest fragmentation in the global carbon balance.”
This story was published with permission from Mongabay.com
