SolarWorld US head says final China tariffs will be higher

Final US tariffs for Chinese solar-energy equipment makers will be higher than the preliminary levies of as much as 4.73 percent imposed last week, said Gordon Brinser, president of SolarWorld’s US unit.

The initial penalty “does not cover the full extent of the harm” caused by Chinese subsidies and unfair product pricing, Brinser said yesterday in an interview in Washington. The decision was “just one of four steps,” he said, though “a good step forward.”

The US International Trade Commission, acting on a complaint by SolarWorld, found in December that American companies had been harmed by Chinese subsidies and by producers from the Asian nation selling their products at below cost in the US, a practice known as dumping.

The Commerce Department will make a preliminary determination on anti-dumping tariffs on May 17 and a final ruling on countervailing duties in June. Brinser declined to estimate the level of tariffs that will eventually be imposed.

The Chinese government uses cash grants, raw-material discounts, preferential loans, tax incentives and currency manipulation to boost exports of solar cells, according to SolarWorld’s October 19 complaint to the trade commission and the Commerce Department.

SolarWorld complaint

In the complaint, SolarWorld and six other domestic producers asked for 100 percent tariffs to counter the alleged dumping. They didn’t specify a remedy for the unfair subsidies.

While Brinser acknowledged that among US solar-power companies there is “a coalition out there that oppose the case,” he said his company has a “broad base of support” within the industry.

The Commerce Department on March 20 told Suntech Power Holdings, the world’s largest solar-panel maker, to pay a 2.9 percent tariff and Trina Solar to pay 4.73 percent to make up for subsidies they received from China’s government. All other Chinese solar-equipment firms were told to pay 3.61 percent. The duties are retroactive to 90 days before the ruling.

“This could have been a lot worse,” Aaron Chew, an analyst at Maxim Group LLC, said after the decision was announced. Chew said some people expected a tariff as high as 10 percent.

Like this content? Join our growing community.

Your support helps to strengthen independent journalism, which is critically needed to guide business and policy development for positive impact. Unlock unlimited access to our content and members-only perks.

最多人阅读

专题活动

Publish your event
leaf background pattern

改革创新,实现可持续性 加入Ecosystem →