Opinion / #ESG
Five looming decisions in the development finance world could help to mitigate environmental and social risks of transition minerals, write Boston University researchers.
Even though the global economy depends on a stable climate and reliable ecosystem services, businesses and financial institutions are not required or incentivised to invest in nature. Central banks and supervisors could change that trajectory simply by fulfilling their financial-stability mandate.
The rise of 'greenhushing' – when companies downplay environmental risks for financial or political reasons – reflects not just changing communications strategies, but rising tensions between competing priorities.
Weakening the World Bank and other multilateral development banks that have a large United States presence could present an opportunity for a little-known, relatively new Chinese-led international organisation like the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.
全部ESG Opinion
14 二月 2025
27 一月 2025
12 一月 2025
13 十二月 2024
7 十一月 2024
6 九月 2024
10 七月 2024
14 六月 2024
2 五月 2024
19 三月 2024
11 三月 2024
5 二月 2024
15 一月 2024
6 十二月 2023
最多人阅读
-
The chief investment officer for AIA says there is "no U-turn" among corporates invested for the long term, … -
A report finds OCBC – alongside other Singapore lenders – among the top financiers of Indonesia's Harita’s coal-powered … -
Despite the hype, AI cannot tackle complex social problems that do not have a digital footprint and should … -
The tool launches as companies struggle to measure and report Scope 3 emissions due to a lack of … -
New technologies are helping detect earthquakes and minimise destruction, but predicting a specific tremor remains a challenge. -
The city is a step closer to implementing its own Producer Responsibility Scheme. Experts at the launch of …
