It was at about 3pm last Saturday when COP29’s media centre was abuzz with news that several country envoys had staged a walkout and left one of the meeting rooms at the far end of the Baku Olympic Stadium, the venue for the world’s biggest climate conference.
To continue reading, subscribe to Eco‑Business.
There's something for everyone. We offer a range of subscription plans.
- Access our stories and receive our Insights Weekly newsletter with the free EB Member plan.
- Unlock unlimited access to our content and archive with EB Circle.
- Publish your content with EB Premium.
A group of journalists and I who were tracking the proceedings of the finance talks – this year, COP needed to come to a consensus on a climate finance goal to fund urgent action – hurried to the location. Members of civil society organsations were in a media huddle trying to explain what they had witnessed at a meeting between the COP29 presidency and the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) negotiating bloc. The vulnerable and poorer nations were unhappy with how negotiations were unfolding.
“They don’t feel heard. They feel they are being excluded from the talks and that’s why they have decided to suspend the meeting,” Mohamed Adow, campaigner from Power Shift Africa, who was an observer in the meeting, told everyone.
The day before, a draft proposal released by the COP presidency called for rich nations to “take the lead” in providing US$250 billion annually by 2035 through public and private finance. It was a figure that even COP29 host Azerbaijan described as “not fair or ambitious”.
By then, the summit had run more than 24 hours overtime and country delegations were packing up to go home, which could potentially cause negotiations to break down given that the conference could not meet the quorum it needed to approve decisions.
Late Saturday afternoon, a final push saw a smaller group of envoys come back to the negotiating table for a last-ditch effort to strike a deal, nearly on the brink of collapse. AOSIS was present in the behind-the-scenes talks, along with United States and United Kingdom representatives.
Almost three hours later, negotiators emerged with a framework for a deal, which was announced with relief at the closing plenary session just before dawn on Sunday.
Developing states had cinched a few key concessions from their rich counterparts, including a pledge of at least US$300 billion in yearly support for fighting climate hazards. This marks a tripling of an expiring annual pledge to deliver US$100 billion, and an additional US$50 billion more per year than had been on the table the previous day.
But developing nations, including India, Nigeria, Bolivia, Indonesia and Malawi criticised the new amount’s “paltry size” and the weight given to funding from multilateral development banks. They said it was “less than a quarter of what science shows is needed and barely enough to forestall a climate catastrophe”.
In the end, climate-vulnerable nations compromised by settling for a process that will explore options on how a broader finance goal of US$1.3 trillion might be achieved at COP30 in Brazil next year.
For now, United Nations secretary António Guterres said reaching an agreement was essential to keep the 1.5°C global warming limit alive.
“I had hoped for a more ambitious outcome – on both finance & mitigation – to meet the scale of the great challenge we face, but the agreement reached provides a base on which to build. It must be honoured in full and and on time. I appeal to governments to do so, with urgency,” he said.